顯示包含「會計」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章
顯示包含「會計」標籤的文章。顯示所有文章

2010年7月15日星期四

最低工資

這兩日立法會在審議最低工資條例既草案。除左靠早前「廿蚊張」既言論引起過一些討論之外,自己覺得係社會上對於最低工資既討論唔係太多。
很多學者及自由經濟支持者都認為最低工資不但幫不到低收入人士,還有機會令到佢地失業。

我自己又唔多同意這個觀點。在我觀察所得工作崗位有係度,始終唔係話Cut就可以Cut的。工作量就係咁多,你話要減少就可以減少既咩?較早前有一位無良老闆話有最低工資,佢公司要盈警,就來要執笠。係人都知做生意最大舊錢係去左個租金度,今天聽到立法會陳淑莊既發言,佢講得好好。佢話佢有個朋友想去銅鑼灣發展,所以就去問下價,究竟係時間廣場對面既地鋪幾多錢租。原來要成三十二萬一個月,一千幾百既薪金你話係唔係濕濕碎呢?你估加多員工幾千真係做唔住,你做唔到咪去d租金平d既地方!你自己俾d大財團襟住搶就要d員工去填。你自己沒有本事就唔好學人做生意啦!唔做生意,你咪去打工,一定要做老闆嗎?自己做唔掂老闆第一樣野就Cut人,減薪。這些人又點可以同佢捱。現在經濟已經算比較之前好,你話再來多次金融海嘯佢地點對你。d無良老闆最叻就係講「共渡時艱」,叫d員工捱下遲些公司生意好左就俾返你。但到到真係公司有錢賺就話要儲埋d錢留返來「積穀防飢」。佢地可能唔記公司有錢賺都係員工辛苦幫佢賺回來的。係佢地身上拿多一仙幾毫就好似要了佢地條命咁!
講返今次最低工資既問題,我自己覺得最低工資是需要的。這是一種尊重,係對出過勞力既工人的一種肯定。出了力去做工,但到頭來連生活都維持唔到,你說是多麼的氣餒呢!但我自己就反對將外傭納入最低工資條例既保障。一來外傭自己已經有最低工資保障;二來請外傭現在是包食包住包機票,佢地生活已經有保障。如果還要納入最低工資條例既保障,恐怕對本地既工人不公平。還有,可能將來就唔包食包住包機票了。
另外,我覺得很奇怪,為什麼除了討論最低工資之外就沒有討論最高工時呢?我自己覺得最低工資同最高工時都是相輔相成。你有了最低工資,難保d無良老闆要你超時工作做返條數出來。所以最高工時係防止d無良老闆出古惑。記得當年做Big 4,一到日,每天工作由10am到1-2am,還要維持幾個月。最高工時就係要防止d人太過份。政府時時話要家庭共融,但連屋企都沒有得返點共融呀!人唔係機器,要休息的。如果真係有些project係趕,你這個星期咪OT,下個星期就應該俾返你休息。例如限制一個月工作幾多小時,就已經很flexible。
最後,希望最低工資能夠順利立法,同時可以制定一個俾工人可以有尊嚴地生活的工資。

2010年1月20日星期三

「80後」再看Big 4

今日在discuss既會計討論區看到一篇題為「一個在迫科的奴隸(80後版)」的文章,關於現今係Big 4工作既辛辣史。記得好多年前自己自己都寫過一篇係Big 4工作的文章 -- 「想唔想在Big 4工作」。現在看來其實裡面既環境同我當年係裡面做一樣甚至更加既衰。人始終都係那些人,要佢地變,難矣。那些人,只要有錢便是娘,佢地又點會分俾d員工。記得當年同現在既Big 4既包裝一樣,講什麼「Balanced Life」。Bull Shit! 根本什麼都沒有改變過!
雖則「天下烏鴉一樣黑」,但沒有比這裡更加黑。或者跟會計師打工特別衰。榨就榨到你盡,又克薄。最好就人工少少,你既工時就多多。功課不但要交足,最好佢連望都唔駛望。現在雖然轉了行,但同一樣既事情都一樣發生,幸好還有少少時間就完成training,可以離開這裡。找工作,我自己都不太擔心。加上,我自己已經一早準備好,應該都不是問題。

不知大家信不信紫微斗數呢?從前我認為係迷信,係唔科學,命運應該掌握係自己手裡。但係依家經過我多次觀察,其實都十分之可信的。
張 博士係我以前讀法律既Tutor,佢就係我畢業之後唯一有keep contact既先生。佢係一個工作狂,但係除左工作,佢既唯一既興趣就係研究紫微斗數。我同幾個同學都俾佢看過,真係唔到你唔信。佢看完這個什麼宮係什 麼什麼,之後就查返佢本王庭之既天書,真係十分之準確。這裡不是叫大家沈迷,而係佢有時會俾你一些指引,知道自己應該順景時要點做,唔順景時就要特別注意 什麼什麼。
大家好像覺得作為律師係唔應該信一些咁唔科學既野。但我經過我自己的親身體驗同觀察都紫微斗數點講我既其他同學,我就覺得紫微斗數都係信得過的。係行業之中,數最信風水命理其中一個就係陳景生資深大律師。
從來我對宗教或命理都唔會一開始就十分之抗拒。始終人所知道的是十分之有限。記得有一次自己夜晚訓訓下,全身都動不到。突然之間,有一本聖經不知從那裡飛來,咁我就可以動了,之後就醒了。所以,說實的,世界上很多野都解釋不來的。

2009年2月22日星期日

足智足球友誼賽+四大地獄師樓

今日出了一身汗。在「綠茵」場上,我過了愉快的一夜。
我很喜歡係這角度看比賽。記得自己都有一段時間都打過龍門,之後又打個中堅。在這裡看,球場上每一個球員都可以看得很清楚。做龍門做後衛有一樣野係很緊要的,就是在看到球隊的後防出現問題要叫人去補返個位。除了這,你這樣還可以對球賽有十足既專注。亦都係我以前打過這些位置,現在改踢中場的我能夠有很高的閱讀球賽能力,往往有一些很高質數的through ball。
已經很久很久沒有再入球了,雖然今日入果球唔係甘清脆,係靠對面既後衛deflect左先可以入到,但總算有入球,係一個很好的開始。
踢完之後,就同一班「足智多謀」既朋友去了derby bar睇波吹水。有幸同北上頻道的一班主持吹水,發覺自己對國內真係認識很少,今次真是令我獲益良多。
回家看到Juve既比賽,在驚濤駭浪的情況下,最終都贏了2比0。不過都差Inter 9分..唉
************   
又無意中看Discuss看到關於一個幾好笑既thread,係關於一個空姐係佢個blog度題為「四大地獄師樓」既topic。其中提及講自己做Big4男朋友係Big4做緊既苦況。
Big 4既生活,在我之前既文章已然講過。日日OT,生活除了面前既working之外,就什麼都沒有。一個喜歡玩既人,係絕對唔適合去做Audit的。Big 4年中都請唔少外國返來既學生,但往往佢地都是最早quit的。或者在外國生活過,加上家庭環境有返甘上下,見到生活除了工作之外,什麼都沒有,你話又點會走都走唔切呢?如果女朋友係好鐘意玩,而你又被迫要工作陪唔到佢,連生日都陪佢唔到,你心裡會點?雖然口口聲聲話唔緊要,但有些事有些回憶缺少了就是缺少了。或多或少,都會有一些upset。但又何嘗知道男朋友個心,其實是心急如焚呢?或者這看來不是什麼,但Butterfly Effect,少少的事對你的影響可能是不知不覺的。早一個星期你的心不是這樣想,但因為一些upset而突然改變。小心亦亦去保持去愛護一段感情,或者就是一些事而令佢改變。現在就算點去做,可以做的已經是很有限的了。

2009年2月17日星期二

成功需栽培

很累,看都看唔到了。本來想打一兩鋪街霸,都唔想打了。都係開個iTunes聽下Podcast,打下Blog算了。聽緊Take Only介紹Google Sync,等我一陣install落來sync個iphone先。不過sync之前要去Google email account度delete一些沒有用的contact先。
今日都有野很開心,因為之前考了個試都pass了。看來今個五六月又有排忙了,有些充實但都係有些心酸酸..
介紹個正web site大家:
想自己變身Ryu,Ken去打,就要看看以上個site啦!雖然現在看了很多youtube片d人打SF4很勁,但發現原來自己用原裝Xbox個joypad係好難出到d combo,特別係那上儲氣系真係很難用。希望我的怪獸,李小龍同春麗可以出到combo啦!
今日還有什麼呢?就是我office的豆豆已經長大了很多,希望將來有人可以一路看住佢長大。
上面寫住:「成功需栽培。」 我一定會努力加油的。
以下之我在Facebook收到關於HKICPA再一次偏袒大行,現在假咨詢想通過以下既提議:
在此次的諮詢文件第 2.13項 (問題8),公會提議, 現在的執業會計師, 在每年的續牌伸請裏, 須多加上一項附加要求.伸請人須在續牌伸請前的一年, 擁有參與本地的核數工作經驗. 不然牌照將被注銷。注銷牌照的伸請人,如需再執業,不論以往的年資深淺,須全都像新畢業生一樣,作首次的牌照伸請。伸請者須証明在伸請前,在執業會計師的監管下,全職工作4年以上。其中75%以上的工作,須為核數工作。此4年全職工作經驗的其中1年,必須在成為公會會員後獲得。伸請人也需要証明,其中1年的全職核數工作是在伸請前的3年內獲得 (註:公會提議改為2年內)。
以下是轉貼該網站:

執業會計師將被無理除牌

致會計業界朋友和社會大眾朋友:

一群中小企會計師對公會於2009年1月6日的諮詢,作出公開回應 – 第一部分
“防止下一次的金融事件,請求大眾關注”

我們是一群中小企的會計師,我們對香港會計師公會於2009年1月6日發出的諮詢,感到十分不安,想用此公開信對公會作出回應,並引起公眾

關注事件的發展。

香港會計師公會於2009年1月7日,發出新聞稿,標題為 “建議修改核數師監管規定 ,金融危機下修改監管規定更顯逼切”。

(註:有關的新聞稿和諮詢文件原文,可從會計師公會網址下載:

http://www.hkicpa.org.hk/corporate_relations/media/pressrelease/2009/PR-20090107c.pdf

http://www.hkicpa.org.hk/membership/registrationmatters/pc/CP-Admiss_0901.pdf )

但新建議的條例修改,有很多是為大型的會計師行提供生意營運上的方便,但對小型的會計師行及個人執業的會計師,却加重監管要求,另人

質疑這次的修改是否另有動機!?

我們這一群中小企的會計師,也留意到公會在多次的金融事件中,刻意廻避問題的重心,沒有勇氣對業界作出正面改革。

執業會計師將被無理除牌
在此次的諮詢文件第 2.13項 (問題8),公會提議, 現在的執業會計師, 在每年的續牌伸請裏, 須多加上一項附加要求.

伸請人須在續牌伸請前的一年, 擁有參與本地的核數工作經驗. 不然牌照將被注銷。

被注銷牌照的伸請人,如需再執業,不論以往的年資深淺,須全都像新畢業生一樣,作首次的牌照伸請。伸請者須証明在伸請前,在執業會計

師的監管下,全職工作4年以上。其中75%以上的工作,須為核數工作。此4年全職工作經驗的其中1年,必須在成為公會會員後獲得。伸請人也

需要証明,其中1年的全職核數工作是在伸請前的3年內獲得 (註:公會提議改為2年內)。

此新的要求, 將引致令人難以理解和不安的情況.

假如閣下是資深執業會計師,因為任何理由,其中1年不能工作,或找不到工作。他的牌照將被注銷。如他的前僱主已去世或失去聯絡,不能再

為他証明以前的工作經驗,又或者他的前僱主不合理解僱他,不想再幫助他証明以前的工作經驗。

此資深執業會計師,便須像其他的新畢業生一樣,找比他年輕的執業會計師,給他4年的工作機會。

4年又4年,人生有多少個4年呢?

在我們這一群中小企執業會計師裏, 所有人都是辛苦的完成和考取本地的執業試, 再加上4年在本地會計師行的實習經驗, 才獲得本地會計師執

業資格.

在我們這一群執業會計師裏, 有全職的公司財務總監, 商務中心的董事, 商標註冊的顧問, 提供秘書服務的顧問, 從事教育工作的老師, 或者

自己營運小生意的公司董事.

這一部份人裏, 已經再沒有從事核數工作. 他們都有自己的全職工作 , 亦無意回到核數行裏工作.

在新修訂實施後, 以上的一群執業會計師, 都將會被注銷執業牌照.

根據諮詢文件的第 2.21項, 這群因為在續牌伸請前1年未有參與核數工作的執業會計師, 牌照被注銷後, 須重新經過4年在本地會計師行的實習

, 才可重新伸請執業牌照.


被隱藏的社會歧視
我們很難想像類似的荒謬情況, 發生在其他的行業.

假如閣下是香港的執業醫生, 想跟隨無國界醫生組織前往南美做義工, 在類似的規例下, 此醫生在一年後回港, 將失去本地的執業資格.

假如閣下是香港剛執業的大律師, 因為未有顧客, 需找教師的兼職工作, 在其中的一年內因為未有顧客, 閣下將會被注銷牌照,,重新一年的實

習, 重新再作牌照的伸請. 此注銷和重新伸請的過程, 可以是沒完沒了的.

我們可以聯想其他荒謬的情況嗎? 答案應該是數之不盡的.

假如閣下是女性的執業會計師, 在婚後誕下子女, 決定轉做全職媽媽. 十數年後, 此好媽媽想重投社會工作, 她須重新獲取4年本地的會計師行

實習經驗. 這是對女性的歧視嗎?

假如閣下是資深的執業會計師, 是一間小型會計行的唯一的執業會計師。 他退休時將會計師行關閉結業, 但數年後遇上金融風暴, 退休儲備大

減, 想重開會計師行謀取生計. 不好意思, 他的執業牌照已經被注銷。此資深會計師須重新獲取4年本地的會計師行實習經驗.

其他會計師行知道他實習期滿後,將離職及自行創業,有會計師行給此資深的執業會計師4年的實習期嗎?這是對年齡的歧視嗎?

假如閣下是香港的執業會計師,某一天受到宗教的感照,决定辭退工作,前往當義工,數年後他的儲蓄將用盡時,需重新找工作,但他的牌照

已被注銷,工作市場的選擇大為减少。這是對宗教信仰自由的歧視嗎?

其他的小事如, 進修, 生病, 人身意外, 或是情緒低落, 需要停止工作, 更是休想!

一位專業的核數師, 只能終生被困自己的小圈子工作, 就是自己選擇停頓喘息的空間都沒有, 此培訓環境, 一點都不專業.

大 型 會 計 師 行 是 否 想 制 造 白 色 恐 佈 的 工 作 環 境 !?

他們可随意奴役員工,員工如作任何要求都有可能被解僱。被解僱後的員工,如一年內找不到工作,他們的牌照將被注銷,然後永不超生?!

曾經有我們行內的從業員說過,有剛完成核數實習期的核數員,想伸請執業資格,要求僱主簽署執業伸請表。僱主不願意增加薪金,繼續聘請

此考取執業資格的僱員,和考慮到此僱員有可能成為公司的競爭對手,所以在簽署伸請表前,要求僱員同意簽署自行離職書。

這是真人真事的情况,而且將會繼續在市場發生!

假如此僱員離職後,勉强開設了會計師行 (註:根據現行的 專業會計師條例 (Cap. 50, section 30(6) 原文:- “如會計師沒有於發出執業證

書日期起計6個月內開始執業,則理事會可取消該執業證書。”))

在以往,剛執業的會計師可先開設一間普通的公司,拿取商業登記書,向公會証明已開始執業,該公司是否運作,並不重要。 剛執業的會計師

,可考慮以兼職的形式為其他會計師行工作,或者做其他的商業工作,以儲蓄資金,將來開設自己的會計師行。

(註:在現行的條例下,剛執業的會計師可選擇以自已的名義執業 (practice in his own name), 並不需要馬上開設會計師行,但公會在諮詢

文件第3.1項內提議,將此選擇廢除。在新修訂下,執業會計師只可選擇,開設執業並成立會計師行,或被受聘於已成立的會計師行。)

在公會的新修訂下, 此剛執業的會計師,如在一年內未能獲取其他的會計師行聘請, 或者是一年內,未有足夠的資金開設自已的會計師行,

又或者是,在一年內,他勉强開業,但未能獲取核數生意,如此種種,他的執業資格都會被注銷。

其實公會早在2005年已採用新的核數質量控制準則 (Hong Kong Standard on Quality Control 1: Quality Control on Firms that perform

Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information, and Other Assurance and Related Service Engagements)。

於2005年中,再提出修訂會計師行的執業審查 (Revision of Practice Review Porgramme) 。經過2年的過渡期,從2007年開始,香港所有的

執業會計師須向公會伸報自己內部的核數質量控制流程,或是否從事核數工作。

在新的核數質量控制準則下,要開設一所符合最低要求的會計師行,已需要頗大量的資金。現在再加上新的續牌要求,剛執業的會計師,如想

從零開始,成立自已的小型會計師行,是異常困難的。

對剛執業的會計師,及小型的會計師行,大大地提高營商的困難,這是一個公平的營商環境嗎? 香港現在還未有公平競爭法,但有可能在數年

後引入,這不公平的營商環境,會否引起對公會,和大型會計師行,無數的法律訴訟呢?!

以上另外提到的被隱藏的歧視行為,也可能引起其他的法律訴訟。

公會的律師費,最終是由各會員承擔的。希望各會員自求多福吧。

公會無理搶奪會員資產,制造市場壟斷
在以上種種的情況,有沒有市場參與者不受影響呢?

市場唯一不受影響的,便是大型會計師行。

大型會計師行聘請的員工,數百至過千,小量員工的牌照被注銷,對整間公司的運作根本不會做成影響。

相反,小型的會計師行,或以獨資經營的會計師行,一位或數位的執業會計師的牌照被注銷後,可能已經另公司不能運作。

公會在諮詢文件內的第 3.2項提到,廢除以個人名義執業的原因,是因為難於監管,但是2007年,所有執業會計師已向公會伸報,有否從事核

數工作,為什麼公會不相信會員的伸報呢?

既然公會不相信自已的會員,我們壞疑公會多次修訂的動機,公會應該不用感受到被冒犯。

我們壞疑公會近年多次的修訂,是營造一個只有利於大型會計師行的營商環境,經牌照注銷,剷除已執業會計師的潛在競爭,及加大困難度,

阻止新的小型會計師行進場,最終達致市場壟斷。

未經別人同意,去拿取別人財物的人,我們叫他做賊。

執業會計師是我們每一個會員用辛苦勞力賺取回來的名銜。這名銜也是一種無形的財物。我們有些從事顧問生意的會員,就是用這名銜賺取比

別人多的生意。我們有些在打工的同業,就是用這名銜獲得更多的工作機會。

我們不同意公會,在會員無犯錯的基礎下拿取我們的名銜。如公會堅持,公會就是做賊!

在光天化日之下,强詞以公眾利益為名,搶奪別人財物,這是强盜的行為!


公會近年的改革措施提供更多利益予大型會計師行
近期的金融危機和雷曼事件。

2002年紅籌公司招股熱潮中,數間紅籌公司的招股文件懷疑失實 (如歐亞農業,金禾國際,杰威國際,富昌國際等)。

2001年美國的安然事件(Enron Corporation), 所揭發的安達信會計師行的會計醜聞 (Arthur Andersen LLP)。

1998年,香港數間的上市公司被懷疑帳目失實 (如廣南集團,威樂控股,順成集團等)

所有涉案的會計師行都是大型會計師行。大型會計師行可謂紀錄差劣,多次對社會公眾利益做成影響。

香港的中小企業,提供了社會基層的就業機會。中小企業亦佔本港商業單位總數
的九成以上。香港的中小企業對香港的經濟和社會和諧都有根本的和深層次的影響。香港的中小型會計師行,一直低調的扶助香港中小企業整

理帳目,從來未有犯下影響社會大眾的嚴重錯誤,紀錄一直良好,持續地看守住社會的安定和諧。

每一次重大的金融事件,社會輿論批評,公會便提出所謂的改革,但數年後,新的金融事件再發生。公會真的有正視問題嗎?

公會每次提出的新修訂,都以公眾利益為口號,另中小型會計師行的營商環境更困難及倒閉,但是大型會計師行的營運,只是作出形式上的改

變,大型會計師行內的企業文化和架構質素,完全沒有改善。

我們拿公會近2年的修訂和這次新修訂,做一些簡單的例子。

例子 一
如公會在2005年採用新的核數質量控制準則,會計師行須成立內部的質量控制系统。

小型會計師行的員工,可以只為3至5人,執業會計師在核數工作中,都需要親力親為,執業會計師在整過核數過程中的工作量可為百分之五十

或以上,一份完善的核對程序清單 (audit programme)其實已經足夠。

情形就像小型的醫務所,只有一位主診醫生,和幾位護士,制度要求護士甲去核對主診醫生的診斷是否正確,然後護士乙又要時常核對護士甲

和護士丙的工作。 然後每一年,此醫務所的主診醫生,又須聘情另外一間醫務所的主診醫生,到自已的醫務所,随機抽查他自已的診療紀錄,

看看是否有出錯。

因為大型醫療機構多次的醫療錯誤,大喊公眾利益的口號,然後要求全港大小型醫務所都進行同樣程度的改革。

如果此小型醫務所的主診醫生,不能做到以上要求,他將不能通過執業審查,將不能繼續經營他的小型醫務所。

因為對小型醫務所不合理的規管,一間一間的小型醫務所遂漸結業,市場慢慢被大型醫療機構所壟斷。

這看似荒謬的情況,在會計行業內已經發生了。

小型會計師行,就算只是3至5人,也要成立複習的內部監管系统。

另一方面,大型會計師行聘請的員工數百至過千,新修訂只需要求大型會計師行內已聘請的員工,扮演新的內部監管角色。

大型會計師行因為有多位的執業會計師合伙人,公會認為合伙人之間的交互核對已經足夠,不用聘請公司外的執業會計師到公司內作随機抽查

。

獨資經營的會計師行,如果只有一位執業會計師,必須聘請公司外的執業會計師到公司內作随機抽查。

公會是否對大型會計師行比較寬鬆呢?

大型會計師行可是犯錯紀錄較多的公司啦!

我們這一群中小企的執業會計師,不是反對改革,和提升業界的質素,但是我們質疑措施的合理性。


例子 二
又如在今次的諮詢文件中第 3.5項 (問題18),公會提議下調執業會計師合伙人的比例。

在小型會計師行裏,合伙人一般全數為執業會計師,但大型會計師行裏,一般有若干的非執業會計師,能成為合伙人,他們生意上的成就是不

能被否定的,但他們沒有執業資格,專業水平對公眾是一個疑問。

公會現在提議,容許更多非執業會計師成為合伙人,是放寬監管,加快大型會計師行的生意擴張。

小型會計師行並無得益。公眾利益更是完全被漠視!


例子 三
在今次的諮詢文件中第 2.5項 (問題3),公會提議放寬本地核數經驗的要求。

原先的執業牌照伸請,伸請人須在伸請前擁有一年的本地核數經驗。

公會提議放寬要求,將一年的本地核數經驗,改為接受香港和中國內地的核數經驗。
(註:中國仍然沒有正式採用國際財務準則(International Financial Reporting Standards)。

在金融危機後,放寬執業伸請的要求,將有利於公眾利益?!我們非常懷疑。


新修訂將令業界質素下降
我們相信,新建議的除牌制度,非旦不能提升業界的質素,更埋下伏線,長遠令業界的質素下降。

以往到會計師行工作的畢業生,就是為獲取工作經驗,完成執業試後,考取執業會計師的資格。我們行內都知道,會計師行的工作要比其他商

界的會計工作要辛苦,但是核數經驗是伸請執業會計師資格所必須的,因此仍然有很多畢業生,不計辛苦,願意入行。

在新的除牌制度下,除非畢業生决定為會計師行終生工作,否則就算他得到了會計師執業資格,他轉行以後,他的執業資格,將被注銷,被貶

為一般會員。

會計師行的工作比較辛苦,薪金亦比其他商界低,從開始到考取執業資格,花五到七年是非常平常的事。

在新的除牌制度下,畢業生若無意執業,大可到國外考取比較容易的專業試,在其他商界獲取一般的會計工作經驗,經海外會計師公會轉到香

港的會計師公會,個程比較輕鬆簡單。

如 果 畢 業 生 知 道 將 來 他 們 的 牌 照 可 以 随 便的 被 注 銷,有 誰 會 願 意 花 時 間 去 考 取 牌 照 呢?

我們相信,核數工作的經驗,提供了畢業生一個穩固的基礎,全面了解整個公司會計系统的運作,但是隨着新的除牌制度,將减少畢業生進入

會計師行工作。

我們覺得公會的大方向,亦該是鼓勵更多畢業生,從事核數工作,考取執業會計師資格,以另業界整體的質素上升,而不是用剷除同行的手段

,令行業的質素下降。

諮詢倉促,動機成疑
這此公會的諮詢文件於2009年1月6日發出,很多會員收到文件時已是1月9日,原本諮詢在2月20日完結。

12月和1月是傳统多假期的月份,很多會員根本未有留意此諮詢文件。公會對外發放的新聞稿亦隻字不提有關注銷執業會計師的新建議。

如此重要諮詢,只給會員約27個工作天的時間考慮及回應,背後動機令人猜疑!

公會於2月5日只是以電郵通知會員 (註:不是整篇電郵,是每月會信電郵中的一小段文字),這次諮詢可被延期至3月31日。有多少會員留意到

呢?

除了公會提出的狠辣的除牌手段以外,有否其他較合理的做法嗎?

我們這一群中小企會計師行的建議:

要求採取牌照分類制度
--我們完全不接受新建議的牌照注銷制度
--我們不接受廢除以自已的名義執業 (practice in his own name)
--執業會計師,對於我們部份會員來說,是名片上的頭銜。如從事公司財務總監,商業顧問,教育工作,或者是一般的公司董事。此頭銜是他

們辛苦的考取執業試 ,及經過漫長的實習期,才拿到的。我們不能理解,我們用自己雙手辛苦賺取的頭銜,在無犯錯的基礎下被搶奪。
--我們要求公會考慮其他較合理的做法,如牌照分類制度。
--我們要求公會發出3類的分類牌照:- (一) 執業會計師 (從事非核數工作,或已退休的人仕), (二) 執業會計師 (從事非上市公司和中小企

的核數工作), (三) 執業會計師 (從事上市公司或大型非上市公司的核數工作)
--第一類牌照的持牌人,因為他們沒有從事核數工作,完全不影嚮公眾利益,因此他們的牌照費用應該是象徵性和低廉的。 第一類牌照持牌人

不能從事核數工作。第一類牌照的持牌人,如從事核數工作,須在3個月內向公會伸報,並自動從第一類牌照轉往第二類牌照。
--公會可向第一類牌照的持牌人,收取第二類牌照與第一類牌照費用的差額。
--第一類牌照的持牌人,亦須在轉往第二類牌照的伸請時,根據會計師行的執業審查規定 (Practice Review),同時遞交及伸報自已內那部的

核數質量控制流程。
--第一類牌照的持牌人,不能伸請直接從第一類牌照轉往第三類牌照。
--從第一類牌照轉往第二類牌照的持牌人,在伸請日4年內,不得伸請第三類牌照。此規定可讓第一類牌照的持牌人,從新熟習核數工作,以保

障公眾利益。
--第二類牌照的定義可商議。但我們見議,第二類牌照的持牌人,只可從事香港非上市的中小企業的核數工作。有關的中小企,在該年度的結

算日,資本及營業額均不能多於二千萬。
--第二類牌照的持牌人,可伸請轉往第三類牌照。伸請人需有營運第二類牌照4年或以上的經驗。
--第二類牌照的持牌人,亦須在伸請時,根據會計師行的執業審查規定 (Practice Review),同時遞交及伸報自已內那部的核數質量控制流程

。
--公會須經過 實 地 的 執業審查,和審查通過後,才發出第三類牌照。
--因第三類牌照的持牌人的核數工作,將會對公眾的利益,構成直接和重大的影响,第三類牌照的持牌人須繳交大額的牌費,及規定購買大額

的專業保險。
--首次牌照的伸請人,只可伸請第一類或第二類牌照。此規定適用於本地或海外的伸請人。
--在新例首次實施時,申請人可直接伸請第一類,第二類,或第三類的牌照,但所有第三類牌照的持牌人,均須於5年內通過公會的實地執業

審查 (此時限可再商議),否則他的第三類牌照將被注銷,或被降回第二類牌照。
--相應於執業會計師的牌照分類,會計師行的牌照分類只須分成2類:(1) 會計師行 (從事非上市公司和中小企的核數工作) –- 可以用獨資

,合伙人,或有限公司的形式營運 (sole proprietor, firm, or limited company)。合伙人,董事,和股東 (partners of firm or

directors and shareholders of limited company) 須全為執業會計師第二類牌照的持牌人,(二) 會計師行 (從事上市公司或大型非上市公

司的核數工作) -- 只可以有限公司的形式營運。董事和股東 (directors and shareholders of limited company) 須全為執業會計師第三類

牌照的持牌人。


發出此公開信的目的
上市公司的核數工作被大型會計師行所壟斷。

會計師公會理事會的理事亦多為大型會計師行的代表。

我們估計,這此的諮詢,會好像以往的諮詢,將被順利通過。

但公會所用的新政策,實在形跡可疑,而且手段越見狠辣,我們覺很我們可以做的,是以追踪的方式,不定期發出公開信,將公會可疑的行動

,盡早讓公眾知道,引起公眾關注,令公會在新政策上能真正的考慮公眾利益。

我們會考慮將公開信,發給業界,大眾傳媒,香港的立法機關和政府部門,香港的論政團體,和中國立法機關和政府部門等。請求他們關注公

會的行動,一起去看守我們社會大眾的利益。

收到此公開信的業界或朋友,請幫忙將此公開信轉送給你們身邊的朋友。我們也請求你門每一位閱讀此公開信的人仕,不論是業界或社會上的

朋友,寫下你們的意見,送到香港會計師公會。


香港一群中小企業的會計師上

2009年2月13日星期五

此情不再

今個情人節很大機會要一個人過了~~
美麗的蝴蝶要飛去了,甜蜜的夢要醒了。
已經有兩個月沒有真正的開心過。從前的笑臉都不會再出現眼前。
工作看來沒有從前忙碌,總算係件好事。身心都很累,十分之痛苦但沒有人感受到。
「此情不再」,今次不是喜言。
 ************
此Blog叫「分享」,現在好像很多野都唔知點分享。開心?又沒有。唔開心就有一籮籮。
今日一放工就第一時間返屋企打我最喜歡的街霸,還有很多隱藏人物未chok出來。豪鬼豪鬼勁想快些有得用。
************
近日係discuss看到有人講Internal Audit,原來Internal Audit是充滿危險的。真係唔講唔知道。始終沒有接觸這行,有朋友有做開但都是些大既MNC,又點會甘恐怖。
大家有興趣可以看看以下既Link:
都係果句,做Internal Audit真係唔好做,其實overall,Audit都係d乞人憎既行業,有邊個喜歡俾$人查自己,羅自己麻煩的!
不過近日工作,雖然已經不是做Audit,但都係做緊d查野的工作,就係做Due Diligence。日日對住d文件,係d文件到看看 公司是否符合法律,佢自己的M&A同一些重大的issues,然後再寫報告就係做Due Diligence。不過我覺得要做得好,真係要好熟識法例,同埋很多時間都是經驗的。我會努力去做的!唉...不知...都是算了。
現在我覺得做corporate真係適合我多些,做Bar做litigation可能真係沒有其他人好。

2008年12月3日星期三

休息

很久都沒有留言,近來終於在忙碌中偷到三日假期。
說實,自己真的很需要休息。充完電之後一定要努力工作,不要想太多。
************
 做了甘耐HKICPA,今天終於有機會用下佢個library。坐真係坐得幾舒服,又有電可以用notebook,上網又唔駛$。在灣仔等人,在佢個lobby坐下,好過去starbuck傾計。
近來間間Big4都話裁員,Listing Rules又改了例唔再需要HKICPA做Qualified Accountant,香港會計師看來越來越難找工作。剛剛有個Client FC做GEM的,雖然人唔醒同意都攪到間firm d野唔掂,但佢之前講俾我知佢係很大年紀考ACCA,一份一份Paper去考,聽到佢甘勤力,但知道了佢俾人炒了,真係有少少心傷。佢人係比較煩,打電話來係講唔停,但以佢個年齡現在去找真係唔容易。Listing Rules改了例,很多好似我個client FC將來就越來越慘。甘多listing公司都是大陸公司,現在唔需要一定要請香港人,佢地一定揾個CICPA做FC算。始終盤數都是找個信得過,溝通都的人去做。我真係唔知HKICPA在這件事上做個什麼!不過這件事上,ACCA Member都有多些好處,始終以後FC唔一定要HKICPA Member,佢地都會多返一些工去選擇。
其實今次改Listing Rules,我自己覺得其中一個改變最嚴重係那個blackout period,以前係公佈result announcement一個月內董事唔買賣得自己公司股票,現在係每年的禁止買賣期 ,由 現時兩個月延長至7個月 。至於 H+A 股公司,中證監要求A 股公司在3 個月內公佈年度 業 績 , 兩個月內公佈中期業績,1個月內公佈季度業績,每年禁止買賣期會由4 個月延長至7個月 。 創 業板公司方面,年度業績公佈期限為 3個月 ,中期及季度業績則為45 日 ,日後每年禁止買賣期 亦由4個月延長至7個月。真係揾人去GEM上市就奇,個個月都唔買賣得自己公司既股票。

2008年11月20日星期四

陳茂波可恥!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

很累很累...身體累,心裡更加累...
現在工作太過emotion,完全唔能夠發揮所長...做得真係唔開心
做專業人士,真係一句搵87的工作。在香港真係一d都唔好做...
沒有心機,當初讀同做又是兩瑪子的事...不過從來都沒有想過去做solicitor。在辦公室雕花,完全唔係我想做的工作!
******************
回想以前讀中學上歷史科,老師一上堂就一路講一路要我們每一個字去寫下來。這完全不是教書,係默書,完全浪費我上堂的時間。我自己真係很喜歡上堂,有些人唔喜歡,但我就鐘意有人教。唔同意的我會提出,唔聽的我就反抗!很多同學都唔喜歡默書,但就沒有一個站出來反對!我就是唔jot notes,這不是教書,不是教歷史。教歷史應該是有趣的,唔係你講一個字,我就要一字不漏去寫低!
所以我罷課了...........
不應該就是不應該,不是就是不是,不對就是不對...
陳茂波是可恥就是可恥!
投佢的就是盲毛就是盲毛,很清晰的!

四 大 會 計 師 行 之 一 的 畢 X 威 會 計 師 事 務 所 , 昨 晚 傳 出 該 公 司 近 日 陸 續 解 僱 員 工 , 據 稱 至 今 已 有 近 百 人 離 職 。 會 計 界 立 法 會 議 員 陳 茂 波 表 示 , 他 昨 日 向 畢 馬 威 了 解 後 , 對 方 表 示 有 關 行 動 並 非 裁 員 , 只 是 勸 退 表 現 欠 佳 的 員 工 。 他 引 述 畢 馬 威 指 , 每 年 評 核 員 工 表 現 之 後 , 都 會 辭 退 一 批 員 工 , 而 今 年 新 聘 請 會 計 系 畢 業 生 的 人 數 , 不 會 減 少 。 陳 茂 波 認 為 , 這 次 只 是 業 界 正 常 的 汰 弱 留 強 , 他 向 另 外 兩 間 同 屬 「 四 大 」 的 會 計 師 事 務 所 了 解 後 , 得 知 他 們 暫 未 有 裁 員 打 算 。 本 報 昨 晚 未 能 聯 絡 畢 馬 威 就 事 件 作 出 回 應 。

2008年7月20日星期日

擔心

真係十分之過份!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!emotion
之前女朋友咪出過一個job遇到個衰senior,又點佢這樣那樣,食完野又執垃圾,個job大部份野都佢做,連d唔係junior要做的佢都做;take sample又over audit,明明根據公司approach唔駛take甘多但因為同佢以前做那間big4唔同所以就要人地take多d,take完都唔緊要,仲要後來問人知道唔要甘多一手就delete佢,浪費人地心血....
最慘就係女朋友因為這個job時時拿重野,隻手整親左,睇完普通科現在要去看專科!真係十分之心痛...........
都很少見d甘衰既人,樣樣都排場但無料到的!唔好講audit,同客d溝通技巧就真係無得頂...少少野都出一大遍formal email還要cc 埋人地個CFO話沒有這沒有那..真係以為自己做個很多間big 4就十分之巴閉,但個客都係big 4出來...

有做過audit都知道,audit唔係full audit,只不過係material assurance佢financial statements的figures,唔係100% accurate的。你都做完test of control,都satisfy佢個risk level,就沒有理由抽更多的samples話唔satisfy。講真就算俾你100% full take,盤數係流的都一樣check唔到啦!audit大家都知道是門面野,paper work做俾人睇...因為你的over audit而要其他人over time都唔緊要,一個唔該就delete佢連底都唔留低..人地用心去做既野,你就當係垃圾...女朋友EQ高,係我就已經#@#@(*#)@#*)@* X左佢個PKX家鏟!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

2008年6月12日星期四

Fwd: 26 Things you should know before working for a national accounting firm

26 Things You Should Know Before Working
for a National Accounting Firm by Dr. David Satava
Originally Published 1999
Every year millions of salmon take one of the most interesting and
arduous trips undertaken by any animal. After three years away from
home, salmon instinctively try to return to their birthplace. Along the
way, salmon encounter danger at every corner. For one thing, hungry
bears wait patiently upstream for the unsuspecting salmon to jump into
their paws. Strangely enough, while nature instinctively draws the
salmon home, only one in a thousand will succeed. Nine hundred and
ninety-nine will fail to reach home. They will not fail because of a lack
of effort or preparation. They will fail because nature only permits one in
a thousand to succeed.

The odds may be worse for accounting graduates who dream about
becoming a partner with a national accounting firm. For years now, I have
tried to learn what it takes to become a partner in a national accounting
firm. Each time I asked recruiters this question, they refused to answer.
One recruiting partner stated in writing that this information was
proprietary. One would think that the recruiting department would gladly
release this information because it could help improve the chances of one
becoming a partner. Unfortunately, as far back as the early 1970s, the
accounting literature indicates that the national firms were adamant
about making sure that this information was not given to researchers.
Why would national accounting firms conceal the principles of success
within their industry? One purpose of this article is to answer this
question.

Each year, national accounting firms hire tens of thousands of
individuals who represent the top ten percent of the graduating accounting
majors in the nation. National accounting firms carefully orchestrate a
public relations campaign that portrays their working environment as a
magnificent journey. Unfortunately, the journey is wonderful for only a
few individuals. National accounting recruiters are primarily concerned
with filling staff positions. While they are willing to talk about the long
term, they know full well that the vast majority of recruits will only stay
for a short time. The reasons for this will be discussed in detail in this
paper. Thus, recruiters learn how to sell the sizzle of becoming a partner
to young accounting majors, knowing full well that a salmon has a greater
chance of reaching home and spawning than a young accounting graduate
has of becoming a partner in a national accounting firm.

One of the purposes of this article is to provide accounting graduates
with useful information about the genuine working environment of the
national accounting firms. This information is intended to help the
majority, the nine hundred and ninety-nine people who will never become a
partner, know what they will face before they work for a national firm.
The author hopes this information will also help the one in a thousand who
will become a partner understand the tremendous sacrifices that will be
needed to become a partner. If the same vital information could be given
to salmon prior to their journey, they would probably increase their
chances for survival.

This paper is dedicated to young accounting graduates who are thinking
about working for a national accounting firm and would like to make their
first career decision a successful one based on facts and not one based on
"information" published in a public relations brochure. This article is
dedicated to individuals who seek out lasting success in life where
success is defined as having a good paying, productive, and challenging job
that gives satisfaction and time to spend with family and friends, while
allowing them to pursue happiness in becoming a well-balanced individual.
The following represent the ABCs of things young accounting graduates
need to know when determining whether to start a career with a national
accounting firm.
Advancement:
From their first day in accounting classes, accounting professors
speak the word "partner" in a reverential and worshipful manner.
Professors will speak highly of the partners they know and will start
many accounting students to dream about becoming a partner in a national
firm. Yet, dreams, no matter how wonderful they are, can't eliminate the
harsh realities of what it actually takes to become a partner. While the
national accounting firms primarily hire from the top ten percent of the
graduating class, this does not insure success. Recruiters know that the
vast majority will leave and only one in a thousand will actually progress
to become a partner.

What does it take to become a partner in a national firm? First of all,
it takes a great deal of perseverance and patience. On average, it will
take at least ten years to be eligible to become partner in a national firm.
Accounting graduates will have to learn how to do a lot of jobs well,
especially the boring ones that are prominent in the early years. Many
people leave in the early years because they believe that they will
continue performing the "grunt" work for the rest of their lives. This is
not necessarily true. Many of the interesting jobs come years after a
person has proved they have the ability to handle the routine and mundane
jobs well.

Traditionally, there are three broad based skills that an accountant
must have in abundance before he or she can be considered for partner.
The most important is the ability to obtain and maintain clients. This is
extremely difficult in the areas of tax and auditing because annual
revenues in these areas have been relatively stable for many years now.
That is one of the reasons accountants, in search of financial success, are
now specializing in consulting. Obtaining new clients takes an outgoing
personality and a willingness to make cold calls in search of new clients.
Many CPAs are not willing to do this, and this is a major strike against
them in their evaluation for partner.

The second most important skill is the ability to guide and supervise
other individuals such as managers, seniors, and newly hired staff
members. To be successful at supervision takes a great deal of time and
patience and the ability to explain the firm's goals and procedures well.
Many CPAs concentrate so much of their time on client development and
keeping pace with the technical skills that they forget to develop their
interpersonal skills. For the most part, a partner who does not develop
his or her interpersonal skills will not be able to successfully interact
and guide a staff of accounting professionals.

The third skill is the ability to maintain and develop technical skills
while obtaining new clients and developing successful interpersonal and
supervisory skills with staff members. Is it any wonder that public
accountants working for national firms must work over 60 hours per week
in order to develop the skills and ability to become a partner? One woman
once told me that she was looking forward to reducing her hours to parttime.
I asked her how many hours per week she would be working. She
said that she would now be working 40 hours per week. This did not seem
like part-time work to me.

In the early days, the routine work and the long hours discourage many
accounting majors from staying with the national firms. They think they
will be bored for the rest of their lives. One recruiter once told me that
she believed many leave just before the good jobs become available.
Consequently, one must be willing to work a number of monotonous jobs,
for years, while patiently waiting for the interesting jobs to become
available. Also, many accountants realize that they aren't going to
advance to partner. A number of accountants realize that they don't have
the personality, or willingness to work long hours, or even the desire to
seek out new clients. More importantly, many accountants soon come to
realize that to become successful in public accounting, they must be
willing to give up their family at home. At this point, many wonder if the
sacrifices are worth it.

One recruiter once told me that her company had found that those
individuals who like to spend time with their family don't do particularly
well within that firm. People who leave public accounting soon discover
that there are individuals who are more than willing to work long hours in
the hopes of being promoted to partner. These workaholics are willing to
sacrifice their family life for a "promotion." If you believe what the Good
Book says, family should be a blessing, then you will want to spend time
with them. Let's be honest. The chances of becoming a partner in a
national accounting firm are remote. Do you want to focus your time and
attention on something that only a few can achieve? This is why I believe
the salmon may have a greater chance of returning home than an
accountant has of becoming a national partner.
Brochure:
National accounting firms spend millions of dollars developing and
selling an image so that the best and brightest of accounting majors will
end up working for them. Pick up any recruiting brochures published by a
national firm. All of the people in the brochure are smiling. There are
pictures of them smiling on the job and pictures of them smiling while
they are having fun with their family and friends. These brochures are
not only intended to make readers believe that the national accounting
firms provide exciting opportunities, but that they allow plenty of time
to spend with family and friends. And they call Hollywood the dream
factory. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The excitement, advancement, and family time is an illusion and only
experienced by a very few accounting graduates. As people advance in the
national accounting offices, they are expected to increase the amount of
time they work on the job. Since there are only twenty-four hours in a
day, the additional time needed to work must come from somewhere else,
usually the employee's family time. Eventually, if you let them, the
national firms will replace family with your fellow employees.
The recruiting brochures are designed to make the recruiter's job
easier. The recruiter's job is to find replacements for all of the people
who leave each year (see Turnover). The recruiters are not concerned
about employees' long term goals or hopes and dreams. They are concerned
with filling the thousands of jobs that become available each year when
your fellow employees leave. Recruiters must sell the dream of
advancement, opportunity, and excitement to entice the top accounting
graduates to work for them. Any explanation near reality would make it
harder for them to meet their quota.
When reading the recruiting brochure and seeing the shining faces
remember to ask the following questions. How many people actually make
partner? How many partners are happily married to their first love?
How many hours a week will be expected for career advancement? How
can accountants enjoy their careers when they have to work sixty hours
per week? These are very valid questions to consider when choosing a
career.
CPA:
One universal goal accounting graduates have is to receive their CPA
certificate. There are two basic requirements needed to obtain the CPA
certificate: obtaining relevant accounting work experience and passing the
national examination. Obtaining the relevant work experience is easy
since national firms provide their staff members with a tremendous
amount of work experience, so much so that many of their staff do not
have a reasonable amount of "free" time to study for the CPA exam. A
review of the most recent personnel totals indicates the national firms
have more professionals without the CPA certificate than those who do.
After two to three years working for a national firm, many accountants
who are working have not passed the CPA examination yet. Remember the
further away accounting graduates get away from college, the harder it is
to study and pass the examination, especially if the generally accepted
accounting and auditing principles are constantly changing after
graduation.
Dam:
Sorry, this is not a swear word. According to the dictionary a dam is a
barrier that is constructed to control the flow of water. The path to
becoming a partner is controlled by the present partners who vigilantly
protect the flow of new partners into the "sainthood." National firms are
very secretive about who qualifies to become a partner. For every person
who has become partner, there are as many, if not more, qualified
individuals who are not permitted into the promised land. The qualities
needed to become partner are very subjective and extremely political.
Overall, the easiest way to become a partner is to obtain more new
business than anyone else. This is much easier said than done.
A review of the most recent KPMG financial information provides some
interesting information. From July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1998, revenues
increased by 83 percent. For the same period of time, net income for
partners increased by 93 percent. Yet, for the same period, the number of
partners increased by just 11 percent. Apparently, this national firm is
very reluctant about who they let into the partnership. Clearly, partners
only let in new partners who can increase the net income of the existing
partners.
Expense:
Partners view staff professionals as an expense. Therefore, with this
belief, the main purpose of an expense is to reduce it. So, whenever a
partner makes up a time budget for a job, it is an ideal time budget that
can usually only be achieved by Superman. Many young staff members
don't realize this and therefore feel enormous pressure and stress to meet
or exceed the figures on the time budget. How do many of the young staff
react to an unrealistic time budget. In their desire to become promoted,
many staff members will work extra hours and not record them so that
they look like they have met the budget time requirements.
The competition for limited promotions is so intense that staff
members either work many "unreported" hours or they learn ways to
report work that they did not perform in a quality manner. Either way, the
work environment causes so much stress that staff members quit by the
droves (see Turnover). When an accountant costs the firm a few dollars
over budget, he or she usually becomes "persona non gratis." Bring in a
new client and become a hero. This information is never discussed in the
company recruiting brochures. (See Work).
True or false, national accounting firms pay their CPAs for overtime?
The answer is false. No matter how many hours worked, the base salary
does not change and covers it all. This represents one of the special
quirks in the labor laws: professionals are not paid by the hour. If you
work 60 hours in a week, you will be paid for 40. This is one of the ways
the partners can insure that they will earn as much money as they do. So
when the budget for a project comes out, the partners indicate the amount
they will pay. While overtime pay is non-existent, this does not stop the
partners from billing the client for any extra time that it might take to
complete a job.
Family:
How important is your family to you? If you responded very important,
then you have made an excellent choice. Barbara Bush makes a valid point
when she states that when you stand before your maker, will you say "I
wish I could have worked more" or will you say " I wish I could have
spent more time with my family." The national firms will tell you that
you should spend as much time with your family as possible. Yet, they
mean your business family and not necessarily your genealogical family.
As you become more and more successful on the job, you will end up
having less available time to spend with your spouse and children. This
point is easy to prove. If you increase your work hours from 40 to 50 and
later to 60 per week, where do those hours come from? Since there are
only so many hours in a week, the time comes from the non-work hours.
There is an old saying that goes like this. Work 40 hours a week to
keep a job and work the next 20 for promotion. Promotions are always
dangled as golden carrots over your head. Is that promotion worth losing
time with family and friends? Remember this, accountants earn
promotions with the national firms by being willing to give up something
to obtain something. Thus, extra money and longer hours are traded for
less time with family. In fact, many wonder what good is the extra money
without time to enjoy spending it.
Carlton Fisk, Hall of Fame catcher for the Chicago White Sox, once
said the following. Baseball has been good to me. But the time that it
kept me away from my family I will never forgive. The Good Book states
that you can't serve two masters. Decide early in life what is important.
Which will it be? Family or promotions. To change the world, spend more
time with family. If not, then work longer hours and see if a few extra
dollars is worth the sacrifice.
Guide:
How would a person who planned to drive cross-country appear without
a roadmap? Foolish? Yes, of course. Unlike the salmon, humans don't
have any road maps built into their DNA. The National Aeronautics and
Space Commission (NASA) would never send a pilot into space without
predetermining its flight plans with the help of tens of thousands of
experts. Unless you believe in astrology or calling for a "personal" 1-
900 psychic, you need to find a mentor to help you navigate the uncertain
waters of your career.
Advising someone to find a guide or mentor is much easier said than
done. People don't advertise that they are highly qualified mentors who
are willing to give their advice in return for a simple thank you.
Accountants need to find a guide who is older and wiser. The ideal
candidate is a nice person who has achieved success by diligent work and
outgoing concern for others. They should preferably be somebody who is
in the same line of business. This mentor will eventually be a sounding
board to maximize success in public accounting.
The most difficult problem in finding a good mentor is that there are a
lot of tormentors out there pretending to be mentors. These people do not
advertise themselves as tormentors but as mentors. The tormentor can
cause considerable damage to a career if accountants confide in them and
take their advice. Remember there is a tremendous amount of competition
when working in a national accounting firm. Many colleagues and peers
will do anything to derail another person's career if it might increase
their opportunity for the next promotion. Accountants need to carefully
choose the persons in whom they confide. No matter how friendly people
might appear, they might stab you in the back while smiling to your face.
Just watch the national news; this happens everyday.
As a general rule, tormentors have learned the art of acting and
politics. These individuals have learned how to smile at people's faces
and then simultaneously turnaround and say all sorts of negative
comments behind their backs. This often comes as a total surprise. They
may even turn out to be a "best" friend at work. Young graduating
accountants have to learn how not to be so naive about the people they
deal with in the national firms. The on-the-job tormentor's only concern
is to obtain the next promotion.
So what options are available when backstabbers who have targeted
their victim place the dagger in the back. Seek revenge? By all means, no.
The best advice I have heard was the following. First, the best revenge is
living a good life. Continue to strive for excellence in your life without
sinking to their level. Second, be polite to them and continue about your
business as usual. They will be totally amazed
Hard:
Working for a national firm can be a hard place to work. The reasons
for this are numerous, but can be simplified to the following. National
accounting firms generally hire the top ten percent of accounting
graduates in the nation. The individuals they hire have distinguished
themselves from the rest of the class. Unfortunately, individuals hired by
the national firms will not compete against the rest of the class, but
against the best and brightest from across the nation. Thus, for the first
time, many of the best and brightest will compete against people with
similar talents and abilities. That will make it much harder to
distinguish one from the rest of the class.
Newly hired staff members will find that hard work is not sufficient
alone to guarantee success within a national accounting firm. There is
nothing special about working long hours; that is the norm for the national
firms. In addition, staff members must be willing to travel away from
home for weeks at a time. This will definitely put a strain on any family
relationships.
Working for a national firm can be a health hazard. Long hours at a
sedentary job can reduce the quality of health. Working long hours makes
it very difficult to maintain good health since good health comes from a
combination of exercise, nutritious food, adequate sleep and rest, a low
stress environment, and opportunities for diversion and balance. All work
and no play makes accountants dull and eventually unhealthy. Working
sixty hours a week doesn't allow an employee to become well balanced. Is
it any wonder that the turnover rate for national firms is so high (See
Turnover)?
Imbibe:
Most of the national firms conduct their first interviews on campus.
They will send a bubbly and enthusiastic person to evaluate whether a
candidate should be interviewed at their office. These on-the-job
interviews can take anywhere from 1 to 2 days. Candidates meet a lot of
people for short interviews and will be taken out to breakfast, lunch, and
dinner. Be careful here. These meals are not just meals. They are a
continuation of the interview process to evaluate a potential employee's
social skills.
Candidates' drinking habits are evaluated. If you drink and you are
offered a drink, feel free to take it. However, no matter how many drinks
the partners drink, remember they are watching the candidates'
consumption levels. A double standard exists at the national firms.
Partners receive all of the perks and honors and the staff and seniors do
the work. Remember, they are hiring people to work for them, not
socialize with them. Enjoy the meals, because this may be the last time,
except for holidays, for wining and dining.
Job Satisfaction:
One of the most important things people look for in a job is
satisfaction. While Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones can't seem to find
any satisfaction, most people want and need it. Job satisfaction is
composed of a number of factors, including pay, variety, challenges,
opportunities to develop talents, advancement, working alone or with
others, supervision, sense of accomplishment, etc.
Year after year, research continues to document the relationship
between job turnover and job satisfaction. The basic premise of this
relationship is that the more an individual is satisfied with a job, the
longer he or she will stay on the job. Year after year, large accounting
firms report that their turnover rate is 23 percent compared to just 9
percent for the local firms. Remember, people don't leave a job unless
there are problems that drive them out. People don't leave jobs without a
reason, especially individuals who represent the top ten percent in their
class. Furthermore, year after year, the local firms have a significantly
lower turnover. Check out the local firms before signing with a national
firm.
When interviewing with national firms, determine if they can provide
the basic factors of job satisfaction. The basic factors of job
satisfaction include good pay, good working conditions, friendly and
personable supervisors, advancement opportunities, sense of
accomplishment, variety of jobs, and time to spend with family and
friends. So if these are the basic components of job satisfaction, then
many of your peers, both past and present, must not have felt that the
national firms were supplying the basic nutrients of a happy employment
life. Learn from others rather than repeating their mistakes.
Knowledge:
One international business recruiting firm states that technical
knowledge is the most important skill and ability needed by new staff
members. While this is true at the beginning, it is not the most
important skill needed to become a partner. Source Finance describes the
three factors for success in public accounting in order of importance: 1.
client development, 2. supervision, and 3. technical skills. While
technical knowledge is important throughout an accountant's career, its
importance will change over time if accountants are to increase their
opportunities for advancement.
This does not mean that technical knowledge will diminish, quite the
contrary. As public accountants move up the company hierarchy, they
must continually maintain and increase their technical knowledge.
However, before an accountant can become a partner he or she will have to
develop the other skills, more than just technical knowledge. Because a
professional accountant has to develop so many skills and abilities to
become a successful partner, this is the main reason that as accountants
move up the ladder, they have to increase the hours they work.
The most important skill needed for success in public accounting is
client development. This is not natural for a lot of professional
accountants. Yet, since it is the most important skill in public
accounting, accountants hoping to become a partner must be willing to
acquire and develop clients. If an individual is an introvert, as many
accountants are, he or she will be at a natural disadvantage compared
with extroverts who find it easy to talk to strangers. Remember this,
being able to develop clients at the national firm level takes years of
planting seeds before a large firm changes public accountant firms. Thus,
if an accountant desire to, he or she will have plenty of time to develop
this ability prized by national partners.
Leave:
Let's be honest here. If the turnover rate for national firms averages
at least 23 percent per year, they know that people leave all of the time.
Thus, if an accountant is to develop a successful career, he or she will
have to know when to leave. Many accounting graduates realize early in
their life that they will not stay with the national firms for the long haul.
Thus, they plan to work for only 2 to 3 years with the national firms and
then move on. These people work at the large offices just to have the
national name on their resume and to obtain the work experience required
to obtain their CPA license.
A great many of the accountants working for national firms discover
something very exciting. As they work with clients, they start
developing good relationships with their peers in the public companies for
which they perform accounting work. In time, these companies will offer
them jobs that pay significantly more than the national firms. The
decision to leave public accounting becomes a no brainer for a lot of
people. "Let's see, if I work for a private company I can earn more money
and I will work a lot less hours. Hmmmmmmm." No wonder people leave
the national firms so often.
Match:
Frequently when interviewing candidates, firms will say that they are
looking for a good match. They do not mean they are looking for a way to
light up their cigarette. Rather, they are looking for an employee who will
fit well with their organization. Each firm has a different and distinct
organizational culture or way of conducting business. This may range
from being people oriented to being work oriented. Large national
accounting offices are primarily work oriented. These offices are so
focused on processing work that they really don't have time to get to
know you. The primarily organizational culture for national firms is to
make more money for the partners. This philosophy is not an easy one for
many accountants to adapt to since it seems to only benefit the partners.
Look at it this way. The national firms do not have a shortage of
accounting graduates who want to work for them. Like salmon
hatcheries, colleges continually prepare new students in accounting
hatcheries to work for the national accounting firms. National firms are
very well aware that individuals must obtain their work experience from a
CPA firm before they can obtain their license. Basically, the national
firms are more than willing to work their staff accountants "to death" in
order to maximize the profits for the national partners.
Here are a few things accounting graduates should think about when
they seek out a good "match." If you are shy and introverted, the national
firms is probably not the place for work. Why? Because they primarily
hire extroverts. The reason they primarily hire extroverts is simple.
Remember the number one key to becoming a partner is client
development. The ability to interact well with others makes it easier to
obtain new clients and that is of number one importance for partners. The
other important key to a proper match is this. More and more of CPA work
is done in groups. Firms are so large these days that teams of auditors
are now required to complete the audit together. It is important then for
accountants to be able to interact well with their peers and be able to
supervise others. Extroverts are better suited for this as they like to
work in a crowd, whereas the introvert prefers to work alone. Thus, if
you are an introvert, it may feel more comfortable working for a smaller
local firm.
Naive:
This paper was not intended to talk anyone out of working for a
national firm. This paper was designed to provide young, inexperienced
accounting graduates with the realities of working in the real world.
Unfortunately, these realities are not taught in college, and that is a
shame. It is not wrong to be naive, but it is wrong to stay that way. As a
young person, accounting graduates are naive in the ways of the world.
Time and experience will help take naivete away. As a youth, it is easy
for you to believe public relations hype. Remember, the public relations
professionals have had decades of practice at learning how to say just the
right thing to motivate young accountants to want to work for a national
accounting firm.
Believe it or not, national accounting firms need young accounting
graduates by the thousands. The reason for this is simple, money. The
partners of nationals firms make a lot of money from each and every
person who works for them. For example, I know a senior accountant
making $50,000. The partners are billing $150 per hour for this same
persons work. If this senior only bills out 60% of her time, this national
firm will receive $180,000 in fees. While the difference is not pure
profit, because there are a number of expenses involved with each
employee (taxes, transportation, hotels, meals, training), the partners
will earn a sizeable amount of money from this one person alone. The
national firms would not be hiring people unless they made a profit.
Newly minted accounting graduates need to be aware of several things
to avoid being naive about working for a national accounting firm. First,
realize that the national firms have a turnover rate exceeding 23 percent
per year (See Turnover). This means that every three years over half of
the employees are no longer there. If it happens to them, it will more
than likely happen to you. Second, the likelihood that you will become a
partner is very small. On average, partners control over $2,300,000
dollars in revenues (See Work). That takes a lot of effort and a lot of
years of perseverance to be able to control a division with that much
billable time. Not just anybody can manage a multi-million dollar
division.
To be realistic and not naive about working for a national firm, realize
that accounting graduates' feelings start changing from the first day on
the job. During the early days with the national firms, many accountants
discover quickly they will have to work long hours and have little time to
see friends and family. If dating, you will find that your date will express
his or her unhappiness when you are gone for weeks at a time. The same
is true of married people. Unfortunately for many, at the end of two to
three years, many accounting graduates have given up the dream of ever
becoming a partner. They soon realize that they can make more money in
private accounting than in public accounting. They realize that it doesn't
quite seem right that by the time they become a manager and are earning
upwards of over $75,000 per year that this is not a lot of money compared
with the partners who are earning $500,000 per year.
What is worse is that by the time many become manager, they become
aware that their chances of becoming a partner are slim to none. In the
"old" days, it was up or out (See Up or Out). In the old days, if you
weren't processing fast enough to partner, you would be asked to leave.
Now the national firms claim that is no longer the case. Now, in the
"enlightened" era of public accounting, highly qualified managers might
be asked to stay on as manager without the possibility of promotion to
partner. While this might sound fine on the surface, managers who have
no possibility of promotion to partner might end up training people who
might become a partner and their boss.
Ask yourself this, how long will most people stay at a firm that has
you training the next partners because they have more "potential" than
you? How long will you love working in a dead-end job? These are the
realities. Ask people how they feel when performing the same work year
after year after year, knowing full well that promotion to partner will
never occur. This new program of enlightenment has failed because the
turnover rate at the manager level is almost as high as the staff and
senior level.
It is very important that accountants make career decisions with facts
and not with fantasy. If a person doesn't have a realistic chance of
becoming a partner, then her or she should be honest about it, and not be
naive as to why he or she is taking a job with a national firm. The
recruiters and partners know that the vast majority of new hires will
never become a partner. Therefore, accounting graduates should not let
recruiters convince them that it is a realistic goal when they know that a
salmon has a greater chance of returning home than the average new hire
has of becoming a partner with the national firm. It would be better to
plan spending 2 to 3 years with a national firm before accepting another
job with a client. If you become one of the lucky ones, then great. At
least with this approach you won't be so disappointed.
Out of School:
When accounting students get out of school and start their first job
with a national accounting firm, they soon discover lot of things that
their professors never taught them. Throughout most of their college
days, accounting students hear their professors speak favorably about the
national accounting firms. There are a number of reasons for this. First,
the national accounting firms take very good care of the professors at the
institutions they recruit. The national firms use all of their public
relations "know how" to maintain a pleasant and positive image with your
faculty.
The national firms frequently take professors to lunch, help obtain
grant money for professors' research, pay for room and registration fees
at conventions, and even provide professors with staff members to
complete research questionnaires. Some national firms provide all
expense paid trips to special seminars to meet the partners in "special"
continuing education meetings. Only professors of the school where the
national firms recruit are invited. The continuing education of the
professors is not the primary reason for these junkets. Keeping
professors happy and saying nice things about the national firms are first
and foremost.
Your professors probably have never said anything about the realities of
working for a national firm. It is unlikely that they will comment on the
tremendous turnover (See Turnover) or the pressure they put on their
staff to work longer hours and meet the budget and deadlines. It is
unlikely that your professor will have told you about the countless
individuals who, by the second and third year on the job, are hopelessly
burned out, discouraged, and want to get out of public accounting. It is
unlikely that your professors have told you not to rely upon the recruiting
brochures for meaningful information and not to trust all of those
pictures of happy people who, according to the pictures, get to spend a lot
of time with their family. Those brochures are a fantasy and not a reality.
It is unlikely that your professors have ever told you how to go about
selecting the best firm for your personality. Nor have they ever told you
that the turnover rate for local firms is a lot less than for the national
firms. Next time you have a chance, ask your professors how many of
their own students have ever become a partner in a national firm.
Politics:
The original idea for my dissertation was to determine the factors
needed for success in public accounting. One of the members of my
committee said that since politics was an important factor of career
advancement that I should include it in my study. I originally thought his
suggestion was a great idea, that is, until I discussed the idea with other
business faculty. Many of my colleagues denied that it exists. Apparently
they saw the world differently than me.
Anybody who works for a living knows that politics play a significant
role in determining who gets the next promotion and pay raises.
Machiavelli is the most famous political expert on this subject. Basically,
the concept of politics is for each individual to protect his or her turf
against anybody else. People who play politics could never be one of the
Three Musketeers. The motto for the Three Musketeers was "all for one
and one for all." For the politically astute, it's all for me and me for me.
It is a selfish way of looking at things, but there are lots of people who
only think of themselves.
What makes this issue more interesting is that the national firms state
that among their core beliefs and values are teamwork and collaboration
along with open and honest communication. Unfortunately, not everybody
in the national firms will buy into this. While the national firms preach
the gospel of teamwork, everybody who works there knows that only a
select few "individuals" ever get promoted to partner. Thus, the political
person will not willingly share what he or she knows with the rest of the
group if it will not improve his or her chances of being promoted.
The believer in politics would never believe in open and honest
communication. Most of the time, it is best to keep one's mouth shut.
Don't volunteer information unless you are directly asked to provide
answers to questions. Politics becomes more of an issue when you end up
working for more than one boss at a time. This is a situation you want to
avoid. The Scriptures are correct when they say you can't serve two
masters at the same time. Don't even try. The political thing to do is to
pick one boss over the other, depending upon who will be the most
advantageous in your career.
To succeed in a national firm, accounting graduates have to learn how
to treat the partners as if they are royalty. Partners have been raised
within the firm to believe that they are special. They have to be special
to make as much money as they do. Partners believe that there is a huge
difference between partners and the rest of the staff. Accounting
graduates have to respect this difference if they want to survive in
public accounting.
Quota:
Quotas are required for every successful business and need to be used
in balance and with fairness. Unfortunately, when they are unfair to begin
with, then staff members will feel tremendous stress while performing
their job. Take this quote from a national firm brochure describing its
corporate culture with respect to leadership. "Leaders don't get on the
back of their people, they get behind and push." Does this sound like a
place that you would want to work. The leaders are going to constantly
push you to work harder and longer. Rather than lead by example, the
partner will be constantly on your case to do more. Remember, these
leaders are pushing staff members so they can increase their bottom line,
not yours. Ask yourself, do you want to be pushed or led by example? Do
you want to work for a firm that has a fair or unfair quota system?
Revenues:
The Big Five are always pleased to advertise that their partners are
doing extremely well. The reason they are doing so well is that they
expect their staff to be happy with their salaries. Unfortunately, when
the staff members of the national firms find out that their counterparts
in private accounting are making significantly more money than they are,
they frequently change jobs. It is kind of sad, but many partners realize
that they are training their staff to eventually work for their clients.
There is a great gulf between partners' earnings and the rest of the
professional staff. This gulf will last a lifetime if you only provide a
service as an employee of the firm. Don't kid yourself that you can
become a partner by just doing good work. So can tens of thousands of
other accounting graduates who have come and gone. If you really want to
become a partner, you will have to develop the ability to attract clients to
the firm. If you can't attract clients, then develop a service that the
national accounting firms can sell to their clients. The ability to generate
revenues is the number one trait needed to become a partner with the
large accounting firms. Remember, accountants love to count money,
especially when it is theirs.
Supervision:
Source Finance believes supervision is the number two skill needed for
success within the national firms. While second, it is a distant second.
As discussed, the number one skill for promotion to partner is client
development. The more clients you bring into a firm, the greater chance a
person has of becoming a partner. No matter how great your supervisory
skills are or become, the heros at the national public firms are those who
bring in more clients. For this reason, many partners frequently don't
allocate a significant amount of time to developing their supervisory
skills when it is not rewarded like client development is.
Thus, it is not uncommon for partners and managers to throw work your
way with only a brief explanation to guide your efforts. I remember my
first audit. The manager tossed some work on my table and said "do it." I
was really confused. The last time I had heard that expression was when I
was in eighth grade and I asked my mother how to dance. She said "just
do it." "Do what?" I responded. She said to, just go out on the dance
floor and "just do it." To this day I still don't know what "it is."
The lack of supervision will cause newly minted accounting graduates
a lot of stress. Only a few people will succeed in this environment.
While the public accounting profession requires candidates to work for a
CPA, they do not require the supervision to be excellent. For me, if it
had not been for one nice CPA, I would not be a CPA today. Good
supervisors can help you grow as a professional. If you find one, thank
him or her because that person is improving your chances of advancement
more than he or she is helping his or her own career.
Turnover:
Each year, the AICPA conducts a survey dealing with professional staff
turnover in public accounting. Over the past five years, the large public
accounting firms reportedly average an annual turnover rate of 23 percent.
Some think this figure is low as since not all of the national firms
respond to the survey. Quite honestly, this means that the best and
brightest of the graduating class don't last very long. Because they leave
the national firms early in their career, this should indicate how difficult
it is to advance, especially when they stay for such a short time.
Overall, people don't last long with the national firms. At the same
time, the local firms have an annual turnover rate of just nine percent.
Sheridan conducted a study to determine why people stay at some CPA
firms longer than with other firms. The results of his study are not
surprising. He determined that firms that care about their employees have
employees who stay longer on the job. He found that firms who care more
about getting the work done than their fellow employees have much higher
turnover.
If the average turnover for a national firm is 23 percent and there are
four levels within the hierarchy, one would suspect that the turnover rate
would decrease as one moves up. Except for partner, this is not the case.
It takes approximately 6 years to become a manager. Yet managers'
turnover rate is nearly as high as the staff and seniors. This is not
encouraging if your goal is to become a partner. As would be expected,
the national firms are don't want to discuss their turnover rate because
it would be difficult to reconcile it with their marketing and public
relations campaigns. (See Family and Brochure).
After two years on the job, nearly one-half of the original work force
has left the national firms. After three years, two-thirds of the original
staff have left. Somewhere between the second and third year, many
seniors feel depressed and disillusioned. During the first three years with
a national accounting firm, many people give up the dream of ever
becoming partner and start thinking about working outside public
accounting. At this point, the salmon continue to have a better chance of
survival than does a staff accountant. Of course, there are always a few
exceptions who are happy and content. Those few individuals are the ones
shown smiling on the company brochures. A firm with significant
turnover does not sound like a real career opportunity for the best and
brightest.
Up or Out:
For many years, it was common knowledge that unless an accountant
was progressing at a "satisfactory rate" toward partner, the company
would replace that person with a younger, less skilled individual who was
perceived to have better partnership potential. The national firms claim
that this is no longer the case. To some extent, this may be true. The
national firms now claim to work as follows. If a person is a wonderful
manager but will never make partner, he or she can stay on as a manager.
For those without ambition, who don't mind performing the same routine
work for the remainder of their career, this may be a good situation.
What about the person with ambition? This stagnant position situation
does not sound like it provides a great deal of job satisfaction for
individuals who want more opportunities in their future. Having a dead
end job could cause a lot of job dissatisfaction leading to high turnover
(See Turnover). While the national firms don't push people out as much as
they used to, they don't have to. The dead end jobs are causing managers
to change jobs due to job dissatisfaction. A good job provides people with
a sense of accomplishment. A lack of accomplishment leads to managers
looking for another job in record numbers.
View:
Don't over glamorize your view of a partner in a national office. Just
because they are partners does not mean that they know anything more
about life than anybody else. In fact, because of all the hours they work,
they probably know less about life and the real world than you do. What
they do know is how to get promoted to partner in a national office. When
you think about it, their job may not be as glamorous as you think. The
national partners have to put in long hours dealing with clients and staff,
obtaining new clients, attending partner meetings, making sure their
work is out before the deadline, keeping up with their specialty, etc. All
in all, they have a lot of responsibilities and a lot of pressure to increase
revenues and decrease costs to increase net income to partners. Even
partners have somebody to report to, the other partners.
So when do partners get to enjoy the fruits of their labor? Well, for
many, the rewards of their labor is more labor. That is, their reward for
working hard is the ability to continue working hard in the future. Many
partners really get excited about the work they do, so much so, that they
don't have time to care about the rest of their life. You might consider a
partner somewhat like a bee who has to continue to pollinate for the
benefit of the beehive. As the bee jumps from one flower to the next, so
do partners. Partners have so many "business" things to attend to that
they don't have time to keep up with anything else. But, they do get
excited trying to be the best "partner" in the firm.
You may think that partners have it made and are like "gods."
Unfortunately, as a professional moves up the hierarchical ladder, there is
continual pressure to obtain the status of senior partner and maybe even
become the managing partner and run the entire show from the corporate
headquarters. The view does not get any better as you move up the
promotional ladder because there are less opportunities for advancement
and you find yourself competing with very talented and dedicated
professionals.
As you move up the corporate ladder, there are more and more business
obligations to attend to. The pressure to produce does not decrease when
you become a partner; it only increases. To increase revenues many
partners join civic and charitable groups. They do this to develop
contacts that might later lead to a new client. Some partners are very
careful about choosing the right church, not for religious reasons, but for
potential business reasons. Overall, partners have to report and be
accountable to the other partners. What the other partners want is more
profits. So be careful what you dream about; someday you might obtain it.
Work:
A review of the June l998 financial highlights of KPMG Peat Marwick in
the United States is quite interesting. This past year, the average annual
revenues increased 64 percent since the year ended June 1994. What
does all of this mean? Each partner, on average, is in charge of a $2.3
million dollar business. In the same time period net income increased
from $261,000 to $503,000. Not only are annual revenues increasing at a
rapid pace, net income keeps improving because of how well the partners
control costs.
During the same five year time period, net income to partners increased
93 percent. Thus, while revenues increased 64 percent over the past five
years, net income to partners increased 93 percent over the same period.
This could have only occurred if the partners were successful in reducing
costs significantly. On average, each partner supervises 12.5 employees.
Overall, 13.5 people (one partner and 12.5 staff) generate $2.3 million
dollars in annual revenues. To become a successful partner at KMPG, you
have to work diligently to increase revenues, decrease costs, motivate
people to work harder for less money, and maintain technical skills. It is
any wonder that the partners work long hours?
An analysis of KMPG's annual report indicates how much work and
growth are required before an individual can advance to partner.
Including partners, the average revenue generated by each and every
person at KMPG is $176,000. This indicates that when people start with a
national firm, they may be responsible for individually generating over
$100,000 in billable hours. By the time they become partner, they will be
in charge of a staff generating over $2.3 million dollars per year. It takes
a great deal of work for an accounting graduate to make the transition
from a staff member to a partner. Is it any wonder that staff members
who want to become a partner have to work long hours in a national firm?
I am not against work. Far from it. Finding work that fulfills us is one
of the greatest joys in life. I am against work that separates parents
from family for long periods of time. I am against people having to work
overtime for no money so that the partners can make more money. I am
against jobs that cause people to work so many hours that they go home so
tired that they can't have "quality time" with their children. I am
against partners who believe that they have to make more money in order
to be happy. Believe it or not, there are partners who believe that they
can never earn enough money. Thus, they strive for more. The amount of
money one makes is not the mark of a true man or woman. The true mark
of a man or a woman is character: honesty, dependability, outgoing
concern for others, love of family, friends, and even love for a Supreme
Spiritual Being.
Born in the late 1800s and a trusted advisor of presidents, Bernard
Baruch went home one day to tell his father some impressive news, or so
he thought. On that fateful day, he told his "poor" father that he had
become a millionaire, when a million dollars was really worth tens of
millions of dollars. His father responded with a simple "so." Hurt by
those remarks, Bernard Baruch changed his life to devote himself to
public service instead of just becoming a man of wealth. That one-word
response got Bernard Baruch to realize that there is more to life than
accumulated wealth. The question is how long will it take you to realize
what is really important in life?
X-Chromosome:
There was a time not too long ago when the national accounting firms
would not even hire women. Then they started hiring them, but found
ways to keep them from becoming partner. One woman had to take the
partners all the way to the Supreme Court to obtain justice. The partners
of her firm had denied her partnership status because she did not act the
way they thought a lady should act. In spite of the fact that this woman
generated very high revenues for the firm, they promoted a man to partner
who had many more personality faults than her. The national firms now
claim to be so progressive that they let women work part-time. Yet,
while this is possible, many women have found out that they feel left
"out of the loop" because of the days they are not there. Part-time work
can be a relative term from 3 days a week to working only 40 hours a
week.
Overall, the latest study by the AICPA indicates that the percentage of
new graduates by gender hired by CPA firms is approximately 50-50.
While women have been making great strides in public accounting, they
still do not represent the majority of professional staff who are employed
by a national firm at any given time. According to the same AICPA study,
professional staff (CPAs, prospective CPAs, and others trained to practice
public accounting) working for national firms are composed of
approximately 61% men and 39% women. At the same time, those
working for the national firms who have their CPA licenses are composed
of 66 percent men and 34 percent women. The percentage of professional
staff who were terminated or who resigned from national CPA firms is
approximately 57 percent male and 43 percent female.
While this implies that evenly the total makeup of national firms will
someday have equal amounts of men and women, at the moment most
national CPA firms are male dominated, especially at the top. In the
AICPA's latest study, 92 percent of the partners in national firms are
male as compared to 8 percent who are female. Thus, while over onethird
of the professionals who work for national CPA firms are female,
only 8 percent of them have become partner. Part of the reason for this is
the fact that women have not been in public accounting as long as men.
The AICPA also conducted a survey that found that an increasing
number of women are moving up the hierarchical ladder and becoming
manager and partner. The AICPA study indicated that while one-third of
the newly appointed senior managers were women, turnover among women
in the profession is a continuing problem. The AICPA study also found
that while woman have been making progress, their turnover rate
increases at a faster rate than men, especially as they move up the
corporate ladder.
Yaw:
No, this is not a misprint, but an actual word that has significant
meaning. To maximize one's career potential, it is vital not to yaw. So
you don't know what this word means yet. Neither did I until I looked it up
in a dictionary. The word yaw means to deviate from the intended course
of action. Successful people generally have a strong idea and vision of
where they are going in life. It is a well accepted fact of life that people
who know where they are going will get there faster than people who do
not have any ideas about where they are going in life.
If you don't have any strong convictions about where you are going in
your career, it will become too easy for you to deviate from your
intended course in life. To become a partner in a national accounting firm
or any other highly skilled job, you must grow in the "right" skills and
abilities of that profession. The earlier you determine the "correct"
course of action in your life, the easier it will be for you to identify and
train yourself for those important "transitional" windows of
opportunities.
In plain English, this means that you may want to start your career off
as a staff accountant. During these early years you will be doing detailed
work, often called grunt work, and be supervised by a senior. To become a
senior, you will have to develop the ability to direct, manage, and
supervise the work of others. This may not come easily if you have not
previously developed interpersonal skills as well as an understanding of
the technical details of the assigned task. An unwillingness or inability
to develop new skills, as necessary, may cause you to delay your rise to
the top because there are many individuals who are willing to step up to
the plate and deliver.
The leap from staff to senior is not as dramatic as the leap from senior
to manager. Up until now, the senior's supervisory role has been more of a
one-on-one basis with a single project. To become a manager, you have to
learn how to supervise the work of several seniors and staff, be
responsible for an entire audit from start to finish, and be able to review
the work of others and to increase interaction with the client. In
addition, managers will have to train, evaluate, and determine the
ultimate fate of their staff.
If you thought the leap from senior to manager was huge, the leap to
partner is the difference between heaven and you know that other place.
To become a partner, you will have to convince the other partners that you
have the ability to hob nob with enough successful people that you could
manage and build a thriving practice in excess of over 2 million dollars a
year.
An inability to develop the appropriate skills and abilit